ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE- To study disposal of different types of biomedical waste and to studythe status of BMW management in different level of hospitalsMETHOD-Medical facilities were divided into 4 groups. 10 facilities from each groupwere selected by simple random sampling. Facilities were visited by surveying groupsand specific data about collection and disposal of waste were collected by askingmanagement personnels of hospitals, doctors and staff.RESULT- 90% of single speciality hospitals and 80% of multispeciality hospitals arefollowing proper storage and segregations of BMW.90% of super speciality hospitalshave transportation facilities.60% of super speciality hospitals , 30% of multispecialityand 20% of single speciality hospitals have incinerators. All super speciality hospitalshave autoclave machines, while 70% of single and 50% of multispeciality hospitalshave that. While only 2 out of 10 clinics have an autoclave machine.60% of both clinicsand Superspeciality hospitals are using land disposal as a method of BMWmanagement. 80% of small clinics and 70% of multispeciality hospitals are having dryand wet thermal management.CONCLUSION- Superspeciality hospitals and Single specialty hospitals are usingcostly methods like incineration and autoclave also following guidelines for storage ,segregation and transportation of BMW properly while amongst all most small clinicscan’t afford costly methods so uses cheaper techniques like chemical treatment and dryand wet thermal methods.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE- To study the knowledge of breast cancer, early detection methods and whomto consult after detecting abnormality among female tertiary health workers.METHOD- This is a descriptive cross-sectional study of 70 female health workers age groupmore than 20 years carried out at various hospitals after taking consent.RESULT- Being majority of young married doctor respondents, below the age of 40 years(81.4%) study was conducted, almost all the respondents are aware of breast cancer, 69(98.5%). Majority of them got information from media (77.1%), followed by seminars(64.2%) and books (62.8%). Only 15.7% of respondents had a positive family history ofbreast cancer. Most participants were aware of BSE and thinks its useful tool (74.3%) butdoesn’t know about proper timing and method for BSE. They have been taught BSE (58.5%)out of which majority were taught by teachers (51.5%). 41.4% and 60% of respondents knewthat BSE should be done monthly and should start after age of 20 respectively. Onerespondent has discovered an abnormality. Respondents are relatively less aware about BSE28 (40%). 45 (64.3%) and 16 (22.9%) think that BSE should be done by a doctor and trainednurse respectively. The level of awareness of sonomammography was high amongrespondents- 43 (57.1%), but only 8 (11.43%) had undergone sonomammography, because of‘not of proper age’ 27 (38.57%).CONCLUSION- Practice and attitude of breast cancer screening should be promoted amonghealth workers and the general population